Submit

Make a new submission or view your pending submissions.

Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to make a submission to this journal. All submissions will be assessed by an editor to determine whether they meet the aims and scope of this journal. Those considered to be a good fit will be sent for peer review before determining whether they will be accepted or rejected.

We offer multiple article types, including Articles, Reviews, Operator Field Notes, Lessons Learned from Wargames, Exercises, and Simulations, Policy Gap Assessments, and Book Reviews. Please review the guidelines for each type carefully before submitting to ensure you select the most appropriate category for your work.

Before making a submission, authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission, such as photos, documents and datasets. All authors identified on the submission must consent to be identified as an author. Where appropriate, research should be approved by an appropriate ethics committee in accordance with the legal requirements of the study's country.

An editor may desk reject a submission if it does not meet minimum standards of quality. Before submitting, please ensure that the study design and research argument are structured and articulated properly. The title should be concise and the abstract should be able to stand on its own. This will increase the likelihood of reviewers agreeing to review the paper. When you're satisfied that your submission meets this standard, please follow the checklist below to prepare your submission.

Formatting and Style

  • Citation Style: Use Chicago (Name-Date) formatting for in-text citations and references.

  • Title Page: Include a separate title page with the following information:

    • Title of the manuscript

    • Author(s) name(s) and affiliation(s)

    • Contact information for the corresponding author

    • Acknowledgments, if applicable

  • Abstract: Provide a 150–300 word abstract on a separate page.

  • Headings: Use up to three levels of subheadings to organize the manuscript.

  • Figures and Tables: All figures and tables should be embedded in the manuscript file and numbered consecutively.

Submission Process

  • File Format: Manuscripts should be submitted as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx).

  • Online Submission: All manuscripts must be submitted via our online submission portal.

  • Peer Review: All submissions will undergo double-blind peer review. Please ensure that the manuscript itself contains no identifying information about the author(s).

Submission Preparation Checklist

All submissions must meet the following requirements.

  • This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
  • All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
  • All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
  • Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.

Article Types

Article

  • Purpose: Provide concise, focused analyses on issues within strategic competition.
  • Word Count: Up to 4,000 words.
  • Content Requirements: Articles should present clear, data-driven analysis or case-based arguments. They may focus on emerging trends, highlight specific challenges, or offer a brief analysis of current events impacting strategic competition.
  • Structure: Introduction, background/context, analysis, and conclusion. Data visualizations or graphics are encouraged if they enhance the argument.
  • References: 10-15 academic or policy references to support claims.

Review

  • Purpose: Offer a comprehensive analysis or literature review on a specific topic within strategic competition.
  • Word Count: Up to 6,000 words.
  • Content Requirements: Reviews should provide an in-depth examination of key themes, trends, or advancements, integrating insights from both academic research and practitioner perspectives. Authors may also include a critique of current approaches or frameworks.
  • Structure: Introduction, literature review or background, analysis, discussion, and conclusion. Sections may vary based on the article’s thematic depth.
  • References: 20-30 references, drawing from academic, government, and practitioner sources.

Operator Field Notes

  • Purpose: Share first-hand insights and experiences from military or policy practitioners working in areas relevant to strategic competition.
  • Word Count: Up to 2,000 words.
  • Content Requirements: Focused on on-the-ground observations, these notes may include anecdotes, tactical-level insights, operational successes or failures, and implications for larger strategic themes. They should provide context but avoid sensitive or classified information.
  • Structure: Introduction, brief description of experience/context, key observations, and implications for strategy or policy.
  • References: Minimal references needed; include citations for any referenced policies, doctrines, or official documents.

Lessons Learned from Wargames, Exercises, and Simulations

  • Purpose: Analyze lessons and insights from military exercises, wargames, or simulations relevant to strategic competition.
  • Word Count: Up to 4,000 words.
  • Content Requirements: Focus on specific exercises or simulations, detailing objectives, scenarios, methods, and outcomes. Analysis should highlight what worked, what didn’t, and how findings could influence future strategic decisions.
  • Structure: Introduction, exercise/scenario description, analysis of outcomes, lessons learned, and strategic implications. Appendices or supplemental materials may be added if helpful.
  • References: 10-20 references, including exercise protocols, doctrinal sources, and any supporting research.

Policy Gap Assessments

  • Purpose: Critique existing policies and recommend reforms to address gaps within the framework of strategic competition.
  • Word Count: Up to 4,000 words.
  • Content Requirements: Assess specific policies, identifying gaps, inefficiencies, or unintended consequences. Include actionable recommendations supported by evidence or case studies from the field.
  • Structure: Introduction, background on the policy, gap analysis, recommendations, and conclusion.
  • References: 15-25 references, from policy documents, case studies, and academic literature to support critiques and recommendations.

Hybrid Perspectives

  • Purpose: Hybrid Perspectives articles are designed to bridge academic analysis with practical experience, co-authored by at least one academic and at least one practitioner. This article type encourages collaborative exploration of strategic competition topics, ensuring both rigorous analysis and real-world applicability.
  • Word Count: Up to 4,000 words.
  • Content Requirements: Articles should present a balanced combination of theoretical insight and practical application. Co-authors are encouraged to address a relevant issue in strategic competition, providing both an academic framework for understanding the issue and a practitioner’s perspective on its application, challenges, and impacts.
  • Structure: Typically includes an introduction that frames the issue, a section for theoretical or research-based context, a practitioner’s analysis or case study, and a concluding section that integrates both views to offer actionable insights or recommendations.
  • References: Rigorous academic citations are required for theoretical sections, while practical sections may include supporting materials such as field data, examples from operations, or firsthand observations.
  • Review Process: Submissions will be reviewed by one academic (to ensure methodological rigor) and one practitioner (to assess practical relevance and insight).

Book Review

  • Purpose: Provide critical, insightful reviews of recent books on topics related to strategic competition, including diplomatic, information, military, and economic dimensions. This article type is not peer-reviewed. 
  • Word Count: Up to 1,500 words.
  • Content Requirements: Reviews should summarize the book’s main arguments and evaluate its contributions, strengths, and limitations within the context of strategic competition. Authors should address how the book adds to the existing body of knowledge and its relevance for academics, military practitioners, or policymakers.
  • Structure: Introduction with a brief summary of the book, main analysis or critique, and a concluding assessment of its relevance and value to readers.
  • References: Include publication details (title, author, publisher, year, ISBN) and any additional references relevant to the review.
  • Selection Criteria for Books: Reviewers are encouraged to select recent publications (ideally within the past two years) that address current challenges or emerging trends in strategic competition.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.